Manchester City 115 FFP Charges explained: Date of hearing and possible punishment and Pep response 

Manchester City 115 FFP Charges explained: Date of hearing and possible punishment and Pep response 

Collage of Pep Guardiola, the Manchester City logo and Khaldoon Al Mubarak.

Whatever the outcome, the Premier League’s case of 115 charges against Manchester City promises to be a defining moment in the history of the competition, as well as in the wider landscape of sports governance.

 

Manchester City insist on their innocence, pointing to their exoneration at the Court of Arbitration for Sport in 2020 as evidence.

 

The Premier League, however, have taken a huge gamble and would not have proceeded if they were not also confident of a positive verdict in the case.

 

To answer some of the most commonly asked questions about the case, we spoke to Adam Williams, TBR’s Head of Football Finance and Governance Content.

 

Here is everything you need to know about the 115 charges City face.

 

A general view outside the stadium prior to the Premier League match between Manchester City and West Ham United at Etihad Stadium on May 19, 2024 …

Photo by Joe Prior/Visionhaus via Getty Images

The line from the Premier League has been that City have been charged with 115 offences,

although some legal experts have disputed this claim and suggest the true number is, in fact,

129.

 

In any case, the number of alleged offences, which are split into five categories over 13 years,

is largely inconsequential past a certain point.

 

Whether it is 115 or 129, it will not make a material impact on the outcome of the case.

 

What are the charges against Man City – is it FFP or not?

 

The majority of the charges levelled at City are not directly related to their compliance or

non-compliance with FFP/PSR.

 

Instead, they refer to provisions around financial accuracy (the validity of the data provided

to the Premier League by the club), manager and player remuneration (paying employees via

parallel contracts, etc.), and cooperation with the Premier League’s investigation.

 

However, there are alleged breaches as well. City are accused of exceeding the PSR/FFP

threshold nine times in 2015-16 and eight times per season between 2016-17 and 2017-18.

 

 

They have also been charged with breaching UEFA’s regulations five times.

 

When will Man City’s hearing for 115 charges take place?

City were charged by the Premier League in February 2023, but there has been no formal

update on when the case might be heard.

 

Premier League CEO Richard Masters has said it will be in the “near future” but has failed to

give a concrete date.

 

According to some outlets, the committee could convene in Autumn, with some further

specifying November.

 

The complexity of the case means that it will likely be summer of 2025 before City learn their

fate.

 

Can City appeal?

City can appeal the independent commission’s verdict. We saw this with Everton and

Nottingham Forest in 2023-24, with the former getting their punishment for breaching PSR

reduced.

 

However, unlike in 2020 when City took UEFA’s decision to suspend them from European

competition for two years and overturned it, the club cannot appeal to the Court of

Arbitration for Sport.

 

Why is Man City’s case taking so long?

Simply put, the case is taking so long because of its complexity.

 

The logistics of preparing defences for 100 charges of such a serious nature means that this

will not be a speedy process.

 

There will be a huge amount of financial data and legal documents exchanged, perhaps a

million pages worth.

 

Possible punishments if City are found guilty of charges

As has been well documented, Man City face expulsion from the Premier League if found

guilty.

 

 

In fact, most legal experts agree that relegation will be a foregone conclusion if that is

the case. To what level of the English pyramid is unclear.

 

They could also be stripped of their titles in the era during which the offences are alleged to

have taken place, as well as being handed a fine.

 

While City’s Abu Dhabi backers have the capital to ride out any financial repercussions, the

damage to their brand domestically and globally could potentially be irreparable.

 

Theoretically, however, there is a possibility that the case does not reach the hearing stage,

with the two parties instead reaching a settlement.

 

A banner depicting Manchester City solicitor Lord David Pannick KC is seen ahead of the Premier League match between Manchester City and Aston Vill…

Photo by James Gill – Danehouse/Getty Images

Man City legal team

City’s legal team is headed up by Lord David Pannick of Blackstone Chambers, the world-

renowned barrister and specialist in public law and human rights.

 

The lawyer, who was the subject of the ‘Pannick on the streets of London’ banner at the

Etihad Stadium, has previously represented Boris Johnson and Shamima Begum.

 

What Man City and Pep Guardiola have said

In short, not much. City vehemently denied every charge levelled at them in a statement

published after the charges were disclosed by the Premier League.

 

As the public face of City in regular correspondence with media, Pep Guardiola has been the

most vocal about the charges, although obviously, he has been unable to offer much besides

reiterating City’s insistence on their innocence.

 

“My first thought is we’re already being condemned,” the manager said in February 2023.

 

“It’s the same with UEFA, we were already condemned. The club proved we were completely innocent. You know on what side I am.

 

“We are lucky we live in a country where everyone is innocent until proven guilty. It seems like we have already been sentenced. What is going to happen, I don’t know.

 

“We think we have good lawyers and I we are going to defend our position. Time will depend what happens. We will see what a judge, the Premier League decides. In the same way with Uefa, we are innocent.”

 

There is unlikely to be an official update from City until the case progresses further.

 

Related Topics

 

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*