🚨- Sesko for around £70M – YES/NO? 🤔
When a club looks to spend upwards of £70 million on a striker, it’s never just about the player’s current ability — it’s an investment in potential, fit within the system, market value, and future upside. Benjamin Šeško has emerged as one of the most intriguing young strikers in European football. At 21 years old, he’s tall, quick, technically gifted, and has a goalscoring instinct that has seen him compared to the likes of Erling Haaland. But is he worth £70 million right now?
Let’s break this down.
—
✅ THE CASE FOR “YES”
1. Age and Potential
Šeško is only 21. Players with his profile — 6’5” tall, quick on the turn, mobile, and capable of playing in multiple attacking systems — don’t come around often. He’s already shown flashes of brilliance at Red Bull Salzburg and has continued to develop at RB Leipzig. While he’s not the finished product yet, he has the foundation of a top-class striker. In today’s inflated market, paying a premium for youth and potential has become standard.
If he fulfils even 75% of his potential, £70M could end up looking like a bargain in 2–3 years.
—
2. Modern Profile
Strikers in 2025 aren’t just poachers — they’re expected to press, hold up play, link midfield to attack, and occasionally drop deep to create space for wide forwards. Šeško has already shown that he fits that mould. His mobility and ability to stretch defences vertically is crucial for teams that want to play quick transitions.
In teams like Arsenal, Chelsea, or even Manchester United, where mobile No. 9s are essential, Šeško could be a transformational signing.
—
3. Market Inflation
In a post-Neymar world, the £70M mark isn’t what it used to be. Consider this: Rasmus Højlund went to Manchester United for roughly the same amount with arguably less output at the time. Darwin Núñez cost Liverpool close to £85M including bonuses. In this climate, paying £70M for a 21-year-old with elite upside and no serious injury history is reasonable, if not shrewd.
Let’s face it: you can’t get a young, elite-tier striker for under £60M anymore. That ship has sailed.
—
4. Resale and Longevity
Even if things don’t work out perfectly, a player like Šeško — due to age and reputation — is unlikely to see his value drop drastically. Clubs across Europe would still be interested if he needed to move on, meaning the buying club has built-in resale value. And if he thrives, he could lead the line for the next 7–10 years, eliminating the need to reinvest in the position.
—
5. Comparable Talents Are Scarce
There aren’t many U23 strikers with Šeško’s blend of size, pace, and composure in front of goal. Players like Vlahović, Højlund, or Evan Ferguson are either more expensive, more inconsistent, or simply not available. If you want to future-proof your No. 9 role, there are few better options realistically on the market today.
—
❌ THE CASE FOR “NO”
1. Too Soon for a Massive Fee
While the upside is obvious, there’s no escaping the fact that Šeško hasn’t hit 20+ league goals in a top-five league. At Leipzig, he was rotated and occasionally inconsistent — which is completely normal for a 21-year-old. But for £70M, many fans and pundits expect a plug-and-play forward ready to score 25 goals a season.
Spending that much on potential, not output, carries huge risk.
—
2. Better Short-Term Alternatives
For clubs looking for immediate impact, there may be more proven options available for less money. Could someone like Victor Osimhen, Ivan Toney, or Jonathan David offer more immediate returns for a similar or slightly higher outlay? Possibly.
Even a seasoned option like Ollie Watkins or Alexander Isak (if available) brings Premier League experience — something Šeško lacks.
—
3. Adaptation Questions
The jump from the Bundesliga to the Premier League is significant. For every Haaland, there are examples of players who struggled to adapt to the physicality, intensity, and tempo of the English game. While Šeško’s physical traits are promising, it’s not guaranteed he’ll hit the ground running.
Is it smart to commit £70M and potentially wait 12–18 months for him to adjust?
—
4. System Fit Matters
Šeško thrives on space and vertical play. If a team plays possession-heavy, low-tempo football against deep blocks, Šeško might struggle to find the same effectiveness. His link-up play is improving, but he’s not yet a refined back-to-goal striker. If you’re investing £70M, the tactical fit must be airtight.
He could shine in a counter-attacking side — but look limited in a team that demands him to drop into midfield and combine constantly.
—
5. Pressure and Expectations
A £70M fee brings a weight of expectation. At just 21, would Šeško handle the pressure of being a club’s record or near-record signing? Not every young player thrives under that level of scrutiny. Fans can be impatient, especially at big clubs. A slow start can turn toxic quickly.
That mental resilience, while impossible to measure pre-transfer, is a huge factor in justifying the price.
—
🤝 VERDICT: YES — BUT WITH CAVEATS
So, should a club spend £70M on Benjamin Šeško?
Yes — but only if:
The club has a clear, long-term plan to develop him.
He fits the tactical system already in place.
They aren’t relying on him to deliver 25+ goals immediately.
The scouting and data back up his fit beyond just hype.
If those boxes are ticked, then Šeško could become one of the most exciting striker investments of the next decade. He has Haaland-like tools, and while the ceiling is massive, the floor is still a capable, modern No. 9.
However, if a club is desperate for instant impact and can’t afford a bedding-in period, then £70M could prove to be a gamble too far.
—
Final Score:
Long-Term Project with Elite Potential: YES ✅
Immediate ROI with Proven Output: NO ❌
—
Would you spend £70M on Šeško? Let the debates begin…
Leave a Reply