Rasmus Højlund: Risks, Rewards in Decision to Stay at Man United
1. Introduction: Determination to Stay Amid Scrutiny
Rasmus Højlund, 22, has publicly confirmed his commitment to stay at Manchester United and fight for his place, rejecting transfer links—despite intense speculation surrounding new striker arrivals like Benjamin Šeško and the uncertainty over his role. He scored in a pre-season match against Bournemouth and stated he is “really happy” and feels sharper than ever. United manager Rubén Amorim praised his pre-season form and remains “really happy” with his contribution, though admitted the transfer window remains fluid.
—
2. Rewards: Why Staying Could Pay Off
a. Managerial Support and Potential Growth
Amorim views Højlund as a significant asset, citing his ability to hold the ball, link play, and improve team structure. He trusts Højlund will develop well under his leadership.
His visible pre-season progression has impressed coaching staff, and Amorim reaffirmed his belief in Højlund’s trajectory.
b. Encouraging Signs from Debut Campaign
In his first season, Højlund scored 10 Premier League goals and 16 across all competitions, including five in the Champions League, making him one of United’s top scorers.
He earned Premier League Player of the Month in February 2025—becoming the first Dane to do so.
c. Proving Ground High Profile
Staying allows Højlund to prove himself in a competitive environment. Competition from Zirkzee, Chido Obi, and potential new attackers could sharpen his game.
Amorim hinted that the arrival of Sesko could act as motivation, pushing Højlund to improve rather than replace him.
d. Platform at a Major Club
Remaining at Manchester United gives Højlund access to world-class training facilities, coaching, and exposure at the highest level. Even if his form is poor, the platform is unparalleled.
—
3. Risks: Why Staying May Backfire
a. Declining Performance and Confidence
Højlund’s second season yielded just four Premier League goals in 32 appearances, totaling seven in all competitions, including more than a dozen league matches without a goal.
Media and fans have widely criticised his finishing inefficiency and freefall in form. On Reddit:
> “Rasmus Hojlund hasn’t scored in his last 14 Manchester United appearances…”
“He’s a decent finisher but his movement is terrible… no development while he’s been here.”
b. Tactical Misfit and Poor Service
Observers have noted United provided Højlund the least service to any striker in the league—his expected goals (xG) and touch-in-box figures both plummeted vs his prior season at Atalanta.
The club’s inverted winger system and tendency to play long, isolated balls leave him detached—contrary to his strengths.
c. Pressure of Incoming Options
United are actively pursuing new strikers including Sesko, Watkins, and others. Højlund was even considered as part of a swap for Sesko—a proposal Højlund rejected.
TalkSPORT reports Amorim has favoured retaining Zirkzee, suggesting potential departures for Højlund based on form and positional fit.
d. Career Stagnation & Potential Sale
Reports suggest United might consider selling Højlund for around £40–50m, at a significant loss on the £72m paid. Interest from Inter Milan, Napoli, and others adds to transfer speculation.
Some insiders now see him as “more likely to leave” than stay heading into this season.
—
4. What Must Change If He Stays
Improved Service & Tactical Adaptation
Coach Amorim must adjust tactics to feed him better—positioning supporting players in favorable spots and creating more passes into feet.
Psychological Resilience
Analysts emphasise that Højlund often overthinks in front of goal and displays visible frustration on the pitch. He needs composure under pressure.
More Chances & Consistency
Although his shot rate per 90 minutes is low (~1.86), it’s his xG per shot (~0.20) that hints at finishing potential. Still, he needs a higher volume of productive chances to build rhythm.
—
5. Conclusion: Stay or Go?
Staying at Manchester United represents a calculated gamble:
Rewards: Strong managerial support, platform to rebuild form, and competition to raise his level.
Risks: Loss of confidence, tactical misalignment, pressure from new recruits, and decreasing club faith.
If he can adapt, get service, and capitalize on his time in pre-season, Højlund’s decision could yield redemption. If not, United may move on—making him a cautionary tale of potential unfulfilled.
His future rests significantly on pre-season performances and whether Amorim can integrate him effectively. The next few weeks will reveal whether Højlund fights back or becomes a chapter Manchester United moves past.
—
Leave a Reply